Sponsored by
Search Caritas Magazine Archive

The TED spread

July 2010

At the height of the Lehman’s crisis, one of the most watched statistics was the so-called ‘TED spread’.

This is again the focus of attention as investors assess on the risk of governments, not just banks, defaulting. So what exactly is this spread? The term itself derives from ‘T-Bill’ and ‘ED’, the screen symbol for the eurodollar futures contract. It now measures the difference between the interest rate on interbank loans (as represented by LIBOR) and the implied interest rate on short term US government debt (Treasury- , or T- Bills).

Because T-Bills are seen as risk free, while LIBOR reflects the credit risk of lending to commercial banks, the TED spread is seen as a good indicator of credit risk - the spread increases when inter-bank lenders demand a higher rate of interest, or accept lower returns on safe investments such as T-Bills, or a bit of both. LIBOR plays a huge role in the pricing of credit (such as floating rate mortgages) to individuals, and to businesses, so a rise in the spread amounts to monetary tightening.

A rising TED spread will also often presage a downturn in equity markets as it shows that liquidity is being withdrawn. Until 2007, the spread was between 0.1per cent and 0.4 per cent, or between 10 and 40 basis points. The credit crunch saw this move much higher, and at the peak of the crisis on 10 October 2008, it reached a record of 463 basis points (higher than after the Black Monday stock market crash of 1987). As banks were nationalised, interest rates cut and central banks bought bonds from the private sector (‘quantitative easing’, a.k.a. printing money), the spread gradually fell back again to a low of 9.5 basis points (0.095 per cent) in mid-March 2010. Since then it has climbed ominously… does this foretell a Greek sequel to the credit crunch? Possibly… but while current levels are high compared to the cheap money days of 2000-2007, they are actually lower than the levels seen between 1990 and 2000 (and these were lower than in the 1980s).

No doubt the European sovereign debt crisis has pushed the spread up. But technical factors have made it worse; for example, changes to how derivatives are traded will affect the banks’ appetite and ability to lend to each other.

Lastly, US policy makers reacted promptly to the Lehman’s crisis by ensuring that banks could borrow cheaply – for example, the Federal Reserve (the ‘Fed’) undertook to buy huge amounts of mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Now the US has turned off the tap – the Fed stopped buying MBS at the end of March. It is surely no coincidence that since then, the TED spread has inched upwards.

James Codrington is head of charities at Baring Asset Management

Comments

There are no comments on this article. Be the first to comment.

Comment on this article
Email this article to a friend


Charities | Accommodation/Housing | Animals | Arts/culture | Disability | Economic/Community development/Employment | Education/Training | Environment/Conservation/Heritage | General Charitable Purposes | Medical/Health/Sickness | Other charitable purposes | Overseas aid/Famine relief | Relief of Poverty | Religious activities | Sport/recreation

Advisers | Accountancy | Actuarial Consultancy | Auditors | Banks | Conference and Venue Hire | Design Services | Financial Advisers | Fundraising Consultants | Fundraising Services | Human Resources | Insurance Brokers | Insurance Providers | Investment Managers | IT | Legal Advisers | Mailing and Fulfilment | Promotional Merchandise | Property Advisers | Recruitment | Response Handling | Retail Management | Risk and Insurance Consultancy | Stockbrokers | Training and Development | VAT Consultants

Caritas Magazine | ACEVO | CFDG | Data & Research | Editorial | Finance | First Person | Funding | Governance | Investment | Legal | Management | NCVO | News Review | Social Enterprise | State of play | Supplements | Viewpoint

Caritas Magazine Issues | May 2012 | April 2012 | March 2012 | February 2012 | January 2012 | December 2011 | November 2011 | October 2011 | September 2011 | August 2011 | July 2011 | June 2011 | May 2011 | April 2011 Supplement | April 2011 | March 2011 | February 2011 | January 2011 | December 2010 supplement | December 2010 | November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 Supplement | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | July 2010 supplement | June 2010 | May 2010 supplement | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 Supplement | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | June 2009 Supplement | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 Supplement | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007