Sponsored by
Search Caritas Magazine Archive

Business reporting language

January 2011
Business reporting language

Roger Chester demystifies online filing of corporation tax returns and annual accounts to HMRC by charities and their subsidiaries

This subject has been a cause of much debate in the charity sector since it first surfaced in January 2010. From 1 April 2011, HMRC required all organisations that had to submit a corporation tax return form CT600, including computations and annual accounts, to be in the format of a computer language file called In-line Extensible Business Reporting Language (iXBRL). This initiative is part of the government’s move towards efficiency through using the latest information technology, and the initiative of course includes charities and their trading subsidiaries.

A common format

The concept behind iXBRL is that a computer generated file containing data and not just images, as in a PDF file, is uploaded by the tax payer into a central database where it can be checked, measured and compared. Let us imagine that we are the head office of a multi-national company with many subsidiaries all over the world. The multi-national has a requirement to produce consolidated accounts. The problem is that it receives a great pile of word documents and spreadsheets. So it tells all of its subsidiaries to produce their information in a common format – iXBRL – it imports them into one database and bingo – consolidated accounts. Looking for efficiencies, HM Treasury and HMRC decided to apply the same concept to the online filing of corporation tax returns.

As we have seen, using iXBRL depends on the use of a common format of information. This format is produced by HMRC and is called a ‘taxonomy’. The taxonomy is written around accounting rules which in the UK are UK Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (UK GAAP), this includes both accounting principles and company law. This explains why any incorporated charity or charity with an incorporated trading subsidiary is caught but from a corporation tax perspective only if they have a requirement to file a corporation tax return. However, charity accounts which are governed by the Charities Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP), and also those of Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) and the Higher Education Funding Council for England, do not follow the format of the Companies Acts. A special taxonomy for charities has been developed by HMRC.

Tagging

How is information actually filed then? To begin with most charity accounts are produced in a word document. This document is opened up in word alongside the taxonomy from the HMRC website. Information required by the taxonomy is tagged (linked) from the accounts document to the taxonomy. After this has been completed the taxonomy produces an iXBRL file which is transmitted to HMRC. An example of the type of information required by the taxonomy is the number of trustees which is found in the trustees’ annual report (TAR). The nearest analogy to tagging is the linking of one cell to another in a spreadsheet. The CT600 iXBRL information will either be produced by your tax agent (tax accountants) if you use them from their software, or you can do it yourself using the free HMRC software.1

Concession for small charities

It has to be admitted that HMRC was a little late into the game as far as charities are concerned. Accordingly HMRC has made a concession recognising that the accounts template included in the free software may not be suitable for small charities. Until HMRC provides free software that is suitable for smaller charities, HMRC will continue to accept accounts from smaller charities in PDF format.2 Corporation Tax computations must be filed in iXBRL format but the free HMRC software should be suitable for these. Small charities are defined as ones where, together with any wholly owned subsidiaries, the combined income does not exceed £6.5m for the accounting period but only relating to submission of charity accounts.

To put it simply smaller charities can still file their accounts in PDF format so they do not have to be tagged into iXBRL. But theywill have to file their subsidiary accounts, and corporation tax returns for both their charity and subsidiary, in iXBRL format and can do this using free software from HMRC. Larger charities above £6.5m income will have to submit both accounts and tax computations in iXBRL. The logic for filing subsidiary accounts in iXBRL is that as these are Companies Act accounts they do not follow the charity SORP.It is the intention of both HMRC and Companies House to have a common filing system,3 but as yet I am unable to ascertain how far this has progressed in relation to smaller charities.

In praise of consistency

Finally, although it may seem an additional complication to file accounts in iXBRL I can see some very real values in it. There will at least be a degree of consistency that has never existed previously. As anyone who has researched into charity accounts will tell you, although they follow the SORP there are wide variations in presentation and content. Imagine if the iXBRL accounting data were in the public domain, after all it is really through the charity commission website – what a resource we would have then.

Note: For further guidance please see:www.hmrc.gov.uk/ct/ct-returns-format-accs.pdfwww.hmrc.gov.uk/ct/ct-online/file-return/online-xbrltag.pdf

1. www.hmrc.gov.uk/efiling/ctsoft_dev.htm

2. www.hmrc.gov.uk/charities/guidance-notes/chapter6/partb.htm#69

3. www.companieshouse.gov.uk/about/miscellaneous/jointFilingFAQs.shtml

Roger Chester

Author: Roger Chester

Roger Chester is head of finance and administration at Lionheart, the benevolent charity for RICS members and their families.

www.lionheart.org.uk

Click here for other articles written by Roger Chester

Comments

There are no comments on this article. Be the first to comment.

Comment on this article
Email this article to a friend


Charities | Accommodation/Housing | Animals | Arts/culture | Disability | Economic/Community development/Employment | Education/Training | Environment/Conservation/Heritage | General Charitable Purposes | Medical/Health/Sickness | Other charitable purposes | Overseas aid/Famine relief | Relief of Poverty | Religious activities | Sport/recreation

Advisers | Accountancy | Actuarial Consultancy | Auditors | Banks | Conference and Venue Hire | Design Services | Financial Advisers | Fundraising Consultants | Fundraising Services | Human Resources | Insurance Brokers | Insurance Providers | Investment Managers | IT | Legal Advisers | Mailing and Fulfilment | Promotional Merchandise | Property Advisers | Recruitment | Response Handling | Retail Management | Risk and Insurance Consultancy | Stockbrokers | Training and Development | VAT Consultants

Caritas Magazine | ACEVO | CFDG | Data & Research | Editorial | Finance | First Person | Funding | Governance | Investment | Legal | Management | NCVO | News Review | Social Enterprise | State of play | Supplements | Viewpoint

Caritas Magazine Issues | May 2012 | April 2012 | March 2012 | February 2012 | January 2012 | December 2011 | November 2011 | October 2011 | September 2011 | August 2011 | July 2011 | June 2011 | May 2011 | April 2011 Supplement | April 2011 | March 2011 | February 2011 | January 2011 | December 2010 supplement | December 2010 | November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 Supplement | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | July 2010 supplement | June 2010 | May 2010 supplement | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 Supplement | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | June 2009 Supplement | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 Supplement | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007